PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDN0.L achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 15.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDN0.L having a 9.93% annualized return and SPOL.L not far ahead at 10.28%.


XDN0.L

1D
0.61%
1M
3.13%
YTD
8.04%
6M
11.88%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
9.93%

SPOL.L

1D
0.64%
1M
6.57%
YTD
15.71%
6M
25.23%
1Y
43.43%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D
8.04%12.19%-5.68%14.11%-5.97%20.44%23.02%16.30%-6.01%15.05%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
15.71%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XDN0.L and SPOL.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.44

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDN0.L
SPOL.L

Industrials

34.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

22.0%
48.0%

Healthcare

11.8%

-

Technology

7.8%
2.2%

Communication Services

7.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.4%

Energy

3.7%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
10.9%

Utilities

1.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Industrials

XDN0.L
34.0%
SPOL.L
1.9%

Financial Services

XDN0.L
22.0%
SPOL.L
48.0%

Healthcare

XDN0.L
11.8%
SPOL.L

-

Technology

XDN0.L
7.8%
SPOL.L
2.2%

Communication Services

XDN0.L
7.1%
SPOL.L
3.2%

Basic Materials

XDN0.L
5.6%
SPOL.L
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDN0.L
3.8%
SPOL.L
5.4%

Energy

XDN0.L
3.7%
SPOL.L
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XDN0.L
2.0%
SPOL.L
10.9%

Utilities

XDN0.L
1.6%
SPOL.L
2.0%

Real Estate

XDN0.L
0.6%
SPOL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDN0.L
XDN0.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDN0.LSPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

4.54

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

10.87

-6.35

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDN0.L and SPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDN0.LSPOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.87

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.55

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.40

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.16

+0.47

Drawdowns

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDN0.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDN0.L and SPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDN0.LSPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.85%

-56.64%

+31.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-9.51%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-19.47%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-46.27%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.85%

-56.64%

+31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.53%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-21.79%

+15.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.98%

-0.68%

Volatility

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) is 4.07%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that XDN0.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDN0.LSPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

7.21%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

17.30%

-6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

23.13%

-8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

27.10%

-9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

25.42%

-7.17%

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDN0.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDN0.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

XDN0.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while SPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D
2.49%2.80%2.83%2.51%4.53%1.09%4.82%4.18%1.05%2.34%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDN0.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDN0.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDN0.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

XDN0.L tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XDN0.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDN0.L and SPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer