XDN0.L vs. PPH
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH).
XDN0.L and PPH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDN0.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 4, 2013. PPH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both XDN0.L and PPH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDN0.L or PPH.
Key characteristics
| XDN0.L | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.39% | 13.38% |
| 1Y Return | 8.62% | 21.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.57% | 8.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.54% | 10.76% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.16% | 5.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.65 | 1.82 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.03 | 2.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.12 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | 1.95 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.08 | 7.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.14% | 2.74% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.30% | 10.67% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.85% | -46.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.76% | -8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDN0.L and PPH is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XDN0.L vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDN0.L achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XDN0.L has outperformed PPH with an annualized return of 12.16%, while PPH has yielded a comparatively lower 5.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDN0.L vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDN0.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDN0.L vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDN0.L vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
XDN0.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than PPH's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDN0.L Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D | 2.68% | 2.51% | 4.53% | 1.09% | 4.82% | 4.18% | 1.05% | 2.34% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 3.16% | 0.00% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 1.76% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% | 1.71% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
XDN0.L vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDN0.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum PPH drawdown of -46.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDN0.L and PPH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDN0.L vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) at 3.32%. This indicates that XDN0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.