PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDN0.L achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than MIVO.L's 4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XDN0.L has outperformed MIVO.L with an annualized return of 9.93%, while MIVO.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.


XDN0.L

1D
0.61%
1M
3.13%
YTD
8.04%
6M
11.88%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
9.93%

MIVO.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.62%
YTD
4.24%
6M
5.52%
1Y
7.85%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D
8.04%12.19%-5.68%14.11%-5.97%20.44%23.02%16.30%-6.01%15.05%
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
4.24%17.54%6.50%8.50%-7.95%13.43%1.38%16.36%-3.04%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XDN0.L and MIVO.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.61

The correlation between XDN0.L and MIVO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDN0.L
MIVO.L

Industrials

34.0%
15.5%

Financial Services

22.0%
17.5%

Healthcare

11.8%
13.1%

Technology

7.8%
2.5%

Communication Services

7.1%
9.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
13.3%

Energy

3.7%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
3.3%

Utilities

1.6%
10.5%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.5%

Industrials

XDN0.L
34.0%
MIVO.L
15.5%

Financial Services

XDN0.L
22.0%
MIVO.L
17.5%

Healthcare

XDN0.L
11.8%
MIVO.L
13.1%

Technology

XDN0.L
7.8%
MIVO.L
2.5%

Communication Services

XDN0.L
7.1%
MIVO.L
9.5%

Basic Materials

XDN0.L
5.6%
MIVO.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDN0.L
3.8%
MIVO.L
13.3%

Energy

XDN0.L
3.7%
MIVO.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDN0.L
2.0%
MIVO.L
3.3%

Utilities

XDN0.L
1.6%
MIVO.L
10.5%

Real Estate

XDN0.L
0.6%
MIVO.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDN0.L
XDN0.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVO.L
MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDN0.LMIVO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

0.93

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

2.76

+1.76

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDN0.L and MIVO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDN0.LMIVO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.88

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.67

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.62

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.74

-0.10

Drawdowns

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDN0.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, roughly equal to the maximum MIVO.L drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDN0.L and MIVO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDN0.LMIVO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.85%

-24.30%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-8.38%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-8.38%

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-17.54%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.85%

-24.30%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-4.95%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-3.61%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.84%

+0.46%

Volatility

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that XDN0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDN0.LMIVO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

2.77%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

7.44%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

8.91%

+6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

10.94%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

12.25%

+6.00%

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDN0.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MIVO.L's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDN0.L vs. MIVO.L - Dividend Comparison

XDN0.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while MIVO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D
2.49%2.80%2.83%2.51%4.53%1.09%4.82%4.18%1.05%2.34%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDN0.L and MIVO.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIVO.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIVO.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XDN0.L.

XDN0.L tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XDN0.L and 0.13% for MIVO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDN0.L and MIVO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer