PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDN0.L is traded in GBp, while FTEU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDN0.L achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than FTEU.L's 12.78% return.


XDN0.L

1D
0.61%
1M
3.13%
YTD
8.04%
6M
11.88%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
9.93%

FTEU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
3.00%
YTD
12.78%
6M
15.33%
1Y
34.02%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D
8.04%12.19%-5.68%14.11%-5.97%20.44%23.02%16.30%-6.01%15.05%
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.78%46.50%4.57%10.67%-9.18%12.84%1.98%15.97%-14.85%24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XDN0.L and FTEU.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2016

0.64

The correlation between XDN0.L and FTEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDN0.L
FTEU.L

Industrials

34.0%
27.4%

Financial Services

22.0%
10.6%

Healthcare

11.8%
5.2%

Technology

7.8%
6.0%

Communication Services

7.1%
3.7%

Basic Materials

5.6%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.3%

Energy

3.7%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
9.2%

Utilities

1.6%
8.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
6.0%

Industrials

XDN0.L
34.0%
FTEU.L
27.4%

Financial Services

XDN0.L
22.0%
FTEU.L
10.6%

Healthcare

XDN0.L
11.8%
FTEU.L
5.2%

Technology

XDN0.L
7.8%
FTEU.L
6.0%

Communication Services

XDN0.L
7.1%
FTEU.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

XDN0.L
5.6%
FTEU.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

XDN0.L
3.8%
FTEU.L
5.3%

Energy

XDN0.L
3.7%
FTEU.L
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XDN0.L
2.0%
FTEU.L
9.2%

Utilities

XDN0.L
1.6%
FTEU.L
8.3%

Real Estate

XDN0.L
0.6%
FTEU.L
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDN0.L
XDN0.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEU.L
FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDN0.LFTEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.40

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.23

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

11.93

-7.41

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDN0.L and FTEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDN0.LFTEU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.16

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.66

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.58

+0.06

Drawdowns

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDN0.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum FTEU.L drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDN0.L and FTEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDN0.LFTEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.85%

-35.87%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-10.50%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-13.83%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-24.32%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.15%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-6.50%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.84%

+0.46%

Volatility

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) is 4.07%, while First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that XDN0.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDN0.LFTEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

5.05%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

13.09%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

15.67%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

17.71%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

18.31%

-0.06%

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDN0.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEU.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDN0.L vs. FTEU.L - Dividend Comparison

XDN0.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while FTEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D
2.49%2.80%2.83%2.51%4.53%1.09%4.82%4.18%1.05%2.34%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDN0.L and FTEU.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDN0.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDN0.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

XDN0.L tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while FTEU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XDN0.L and 0.80% for FTEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDN0.L and FTEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer