FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L).
FTEU.L and LCPE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTEU.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Oct 21, 2014. LCPE.L is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. Both FTEU.L and LCPE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEU.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares | 3.83% | 57.74% | 2.77% | 16.49% | -18.83% | 11.78% | 5.07% | 20.55% | -19.61% | 35.90% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 7.70% | 27.46% | -4.16% | 17.22% | -9.11% | 14.02% | 11.77% | 16.46% | -7.54% | 19.40% |
Different Trading Currencies
FTEU.L is traded in USD, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTEU.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 7.70% return.
FTEU.L
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTEU.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTEU.L
LCPE.L
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTEU.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.74 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 2.16 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 2.32 | +1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 10.56 | +1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTEU.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.74 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.71 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.64 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTEU.L and LCPE.L is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTEU.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTEU.L drawdown since its inception was -46.61%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEU.L and LCPE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTEU.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.61% | -27.05% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -8.37% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | -12.39% | -26.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -1.95% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -3.61% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.37% | +0.95% |
Volatility
FTEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that FTEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTEU.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 4.24% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 9.23% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 16.30% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 23.65% | -3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 26.26% | -6.40% |