XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XDJP.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDJP.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.DE returned 12.04%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for XDWH.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDJP.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDJP.DE achieves a 32.10% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.DE has outperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 12.04%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.
XDJP.DE
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 32.10%
- 6M
- 30.23%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 32.10% | 16.25% | 14.44% | 18.02% | -15.30% | 3.32% | 14.02% | 24.82% | -4.99% | 10.59% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDJP.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDJP.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDJP.DE
XDWH.DE
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDJP.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.13 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | 0.93 | +3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 2.28 | +11.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDJP.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 0.70 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.41 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.51 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.55 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDJP.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDJP.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -26.08% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -10.32% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -21.12% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -21.12% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.12% | -26.08% | -3.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -8.51% | +7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -4.82% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 4.20% | +0.06% |
Volatility
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that XDJP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDJP.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 4.81% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.57% | 9.51% | +9.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.54% | 13.69% | +9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 13.43% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 14.69% | +3.07% |
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDJP.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDJP.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
XDJP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.03% | 1.36% | 1.38% | 1.59% | 2.60% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.11% | 1.28% | 0.75% | 0.89% | 0.16% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDJP.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
XDJP.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XDJP.DE tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDJP.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer