PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDIV having a 10.16% return and WNTR slightly lower at 10.13%.


XDIV

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.16%
6M
8.21%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
1.92%
1M
18.08%
6M
14.43%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
120.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and WNTR is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV
XDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.84

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

7.31

+3.07

XDIV vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-42.65%

+33.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-42.65%

+33.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-10.15%

+9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-20.53%

+19.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

16.58%

-14.50%

Volatility

XDIV vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) is 3.99%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that XDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

18.84%

-14.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

47.46%

-37.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

53.83%

-41.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

53.56%

-40.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

53.56%

-40.89%

XDIV vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.14%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and WNTR have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to XDIV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDIV dropped -9.16% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 21.49% for XDIV. On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 21.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer