PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 3.73% return.


XDIV

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.17%
YTD
3.73%
6M
3.62%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and MAGS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.79

XDIV vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
MAGS

Technology

36.2%
15.3%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XDIV
36.2%
MAGS
15.3%

Financial Services

XDIV
11.9%
MAGS

-

Communication Services

XDIV
10.9%
MAGS
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
10.1%
MAGS
10.5%

Healthcare

XDIV
8.4%
MAGS

-

Industrials

XDIV
8.1%
MAGS

-

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.9%
MAGS

-

Energy

XDIV
3.5%
MAGS

-

Utilities

XDIV
2.3%
MAGS

-

Real Estate

XDIV
1.9%
MAGS

-

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.8%
MAGS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDIV vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDIVMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

1.55

+0.43

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and MAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-29.91%

+20.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-3.55%

+2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-4.70%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

Volatility

XDIV vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

20.08%

-7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.31%

25.94%

-13.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

25.94%

-13.63%

XDIV vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.43%1.48%0.81%0.44%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and MAGS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.29% for MAGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and MAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer