PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 40.46% return.


XDIV

1D
0.41%
1M
4.81%
YTD
11.08%
6M
11.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-1.49%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
40.46%
6M
38.18%
1Y
49.68%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
15.39%
10Y*
7.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and GSG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDIV vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDIVGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

-0.09

+2.11

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-89.62%

+80.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-57.59%

+57.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-63.71%

+62.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

Volatility

XDIV vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

23.01%

-10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

22.61%

-10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

22.03%

-9.74%

XDIV vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDIV nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and GSG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

XDIV and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.75% for GSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer