PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDIV vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDIV vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. XDIV is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. XDIV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

XDIV vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

XDIV

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.28%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF		8.01%10.07%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and EINC is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

-0.09

XDIV vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDIV
EINC

Technology

39.0%

-

Financial Services

11.1%

-

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.1%
99.4%

Utilities

2.1%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

XDIV
39.0%
EINC

-

Financial Services

XDIV
11.1%
EINC

-

Communication Services

XDIV
10.6%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
9.9%
EINC

-

Healthcare

XDIV
8.3%
EINC

-

Industrials

XDIV
7.8%
EINC
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.5%
EINC

-

Energy

XDIV
3.1%
EINC
99.4%

Utilities

XDIV
2.1%
EINC
0.6%

Real Estate

XDIV
1.8%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.7%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with XDIV:
XDIV vs. XIC.TOXDIV vs. VOOXDIV vs. VDY.TOXDIV vs. SPYXDIV vs. XEQT.TOXDIV vs. XEI.TOXDIV vs. QQQ
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

XDIV vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XDIVEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.99

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.67

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.35

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.80

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

9.63

—

XDIV vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDIVEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-87.55%

+78.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-7.89%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.01%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-19.87%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-4.50%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-44.15%

+42.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.10%

—

Volatility

XDIV vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDIVEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.51%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.88%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

15.10%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

19.54%

-6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

25.43%

-12.57%

XDIV vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDIV vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDIV and EINC have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.45% for EINC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer