PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.71% return.


XDIV

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
8.01%
6M
7.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and CLIP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVCLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

26.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

141.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,281.30

XDIV vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and CLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVCLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-0.08%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

0.00%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-0.00%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

XDIV vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVCLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

0.22%

+12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

0.44%

+12.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

0.44%

+12.42%

XDIV vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDIV vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.90%4.14%5.11%2.75%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and CLIP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XDIV.

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.07% for CLIP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer