XDIV.TO vs. XLK
XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDIV.TO returned 17.21%/yr vs 25.59%/yr for XLK. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDIV.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDIV.TO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDIV.TO achieves a 21.85% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 31.13% return.
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 20.22%
- 1Y
- 40.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 31.13%
- 6M
- 30.81%
- 1Y
- 59.71%
- 3Y*
- 32.23%
- 5Y*
- 25.59%
- 10Y*
- 26.27%
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 21.85% | 25.04% | 19.84% | 11.95% | 0.49% | 33.31% | -7.53% | 25.14% | -9.81% | 8.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.13% | 18.92% | 31.93% | 52.31% | -23.15% | 34.68% | 40.21% | 43.68% | 6.59% | 8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDIV.TO and XLK is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017 | 0.35 |
The correlation between XDIV.TO and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDIV.TO
XLK
Financial Services
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
XDIV.TO
XLK
-
Energy
XDIV.TO
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
XDIV.TO
XLK
-
Utilities
XDIV.TO
XLK
-
Technology
XDIV.TO
XLK
Communication Services
XDIV.TO
XLK
-
Basic Materials
XDIV.TO
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
XDIV.TO
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
XDIV.TO
-
XLK
-
Industrials
XDIV.TO
-
XLK
Real Estate
XDIV.TO
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDIV.TO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
XDIV.TO
XLK
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDIV.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.07 | 1.41 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.55 | 3.52 | +14.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.35 | 10.37 | +48.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -38.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV.TO and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDIV.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.29% | -38.68% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | -16.16% | +13.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.53% | -26.35% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.33% | -29.64% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.87% | +5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -7.56% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 5.48% | -4.79% |
Volatility
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) is 2.47%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that XDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDIV.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 10.83% | -8.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 19.12% | -12.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.95% | 22.68% | -14.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.51% | 25.91% | -15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 25.57% | -9.24% |
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDIV.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDIV.TO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.25% | 3.90% | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.15% | 3.76% | 4.85% | 4.24% | 5.13% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDIV.TO and XLK have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
XDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while XLK is Technology Equities. XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for XDIV.TO and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for XDIV.TO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer