PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDIV.TO vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDIV.TO returned 16.85%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for IDMO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDIV.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.

Performance

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDIV.TO is traded in CAD, while IDMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV.TO achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 7.22% return.

XDIV.TO

1D
0.12%
1M
3.88%
YTD
19.75%
6M
19.03%
1Y
39.58%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
—

IDMO

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
7.22%
6M
9.76%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		19.75%25.04%19.84%11.95%0.49%33.31%-7.53%25.14%-9.81%8.00%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF		7.25%35.68%22.34%17.30%-6.45%14.25%19.11%20.89%-9.65%9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XDIV.TO and IDMO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.41

The correlation between XDIV.TO and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDIV.TO
IDMO

Financial Services

46.7%
42.4%

Energy

28.8%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
1.4%

Utilities

11.3%
8.4%

Technology

1.3%
5.3%

Communication Services

0.4%
2.2%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Healthcare

-

1.2%

Industrials

-

22.6%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Financial Services

XDIV.TO
46.7%
IDMO
42.4%

Energy

XDIV.TO
28.8%
IDMO
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV.TO
11.5%
IDMO
1.4%

Utilities

XDIV.TO
11.3%
IDMO
8.4%

Technology

XDIV.TO
1.3%
IDMO
5.3%

Communication Services

XDIV.TO
0.4%
IDMO
2.2%

Basic Materials

XDIV.TO

-

IDMO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

XDIV.TO

-

IDMO
2.5%

Healthcare

XDIV.TO

-

IDMO
1.2%

Industrials

XDIV.TO

-

IDMO
22.6%

Real Estate

XDIV.TO

-

IDMO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF

Often compared with XDIV.TO:
XDIV.TO vs. VDY.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEI.TOXDIV.TO vs. XDV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDIV.TO vs. HDIV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XIU.TOXDIV.TO vs. CDZ.TO
Often compared with IDMO:
IDMO vs. MTUMIDMO vs. SPMOIDMO vs. IDHQIDMO vs. VXUSIDMO vs. EFGIDMO vs. AVDSIDMO vs. AVDV

Return for Risk

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDIV.TOIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.04
1.23

+3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
7.43
1.82

+5.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

1.23

+0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.11

1.82

+15.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.96

7.50

+50.46

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.04, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV.TO and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDIV.TOIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04

1.23

+3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.61

0.98

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.68

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.55

+0.25

Drawdowns

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -30.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV.TO and IDMO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDIV.TOIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-30.46%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.32%

-11.93%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

-13.13%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-21.90%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.51%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-3.54%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-6.99%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

2.90%

-2.22%

Volatility

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) is 2.57%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that XDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDIV.TOIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

6.42%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.39%

15.56%

-9.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.91%

17.65%

-9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

18.87%

-8.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

19.19%

-2.84%

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDIV.TO vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than IDMO's 3.61% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF		3.61%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		3.31%3.90%4.50%4.42%4.15%3.76%4.85%4.24%5.13%1.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDIV.TO and IDMO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

XDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while IDMO is Momentum. XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for XDIV.TO and 0.25% for IDMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV.TO and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer