XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE
XDG7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and V0IH.DE (VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A) are both Energy Equities funds - XDG7.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select while V0IH.DE tracks the MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG7.DE returned 4.63%/yr vs 18.80%/yr for V0IH.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG7.DE achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly lower than V0IH.DE's 55.27% return.
XDG7.DE
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 33.93%
- 1Y
- 72.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
V0IH.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 55.27%
- 6M
- 45.98%
- 1Y
- 95.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 34.27% | 23.57% | -15.19% | -18.10% |
V0IH.DE VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A | 55.27% | -0.77% | -6.42% | 13.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG7.DE and V0IH.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023 | 0.29 |
The correlation between XDG7.DE and V0IH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDG7.DE
V0IH.DE
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG7.DE | V0IH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.48 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 10.49 | -6.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 24.98 | -14.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG7.DE | V0IH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 3.30 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.56 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG7.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than V0IH.DE's maximum drawdown of -44.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG7.DE and V0IH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG7.DE | V0IH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -44.39% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.21% | -9.09% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.66% | -44.39% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -3.97% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -15.06% | -11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 3.82% | +2.82% |
Volatility
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) is 7.88%, while VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that XDG7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V0IH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG7.DE | V0IH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 8.79% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 20.57% | -7.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.00% | 29.00% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 29.69% | -5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 29.69% | -5.61% |
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDG7.DE and V0IH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XDG7.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDG7.DE nor V0IH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG7.DE and V0IH.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDG7.DE and V0IH.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select, while V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for XDG7.DE and V0IH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer