V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE
V0IH.DE (VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A) and QCLN.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - V0IH.DE tracks the MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped while QCLN.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V0IH.DE returned 18.80%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for QCLN.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V0IH.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.DE.
Performance
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V0IH.DE achieves a 55.27% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN.DE's 49.11% return.
V0IH.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 55.27%
- 6M
- 45.98%
- 1Y
- 95.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 49.11%
- 6M
- 47.01%
- 1Y
- 111.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- —
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
V0IH.DE VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A | 55.27% | -0.77% | -6.42% | 13.18% |
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 49.11% | 16.50% | -14.54% | -11.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between V0IH.DE and QCLN.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
V0IH.DE
QCLN.DE
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V0IH.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.44 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.49 | 7.93 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.98 | 24.33 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V0IH.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 3.20 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.08 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V0IH.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.DE drawdown of -69.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V0IH.DE and QCLN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V0IH.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.39% | -69.59% | +25.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -14.04% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.39% | -56.68% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -20.21% | +16.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -39.08% | +24.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 4.59% | -0.77% |
Volatility
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) is 8.79%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) has a volatility of 14.59%. This indicates that V0IH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V0IH.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 14.59% | -5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.57% | 24.80% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.00% | 34.84% | -5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 36.29% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 36.76% | -7.07% |
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
V0IH.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
V0IH.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither V0IH.DE nor QCLN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
V0IH.DE and QCLN.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V0IH.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V0IH.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped, while QCLN.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for V0IH.DE and 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
Find the right allocation for V0IH.DE and QCLN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer