XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE
XDG7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - XDG7.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select while LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG7.DE returned 4.63%/yr vs 24.55%/yr for LOGS.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDG7.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.
Performance
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG7.DE achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly higher than LOGS.DE's 31.31% return.
XDG7.DE
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 33.93%
- 1Y
- 72.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 34.27% | 23.57% | -15.19% | -25.56% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | -4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG7.DE and LOGS.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between XDG7.DE and LOGS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDG7.DE
LOGS.DE
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG7.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.62 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 9.83 | -5.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 34.29 | -23.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG7.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 3.73 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.24 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG7.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum LOGS.DE drawdown of -56.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG7.DE and LOGS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG7.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -56.42% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.21% | -6.50% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.66% | -21.16% | -22.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -4.69% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -15.22% | -11.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 1.87% | +4.77% |
Volatility
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) at 6.06%. This indicates that XDG7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG7.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 6.06% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 13.34% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.00% | 17.18% | +12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 21.72% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 24.09% | -0.01% |
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDG7.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDG7.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDG7.DE nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG7.DE and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG7.DE.
XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG7.DE and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDG7.DE and LOGS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer