PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDG7.DE achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 39.28% return.


XDG7.DE

1D
-2.33%
1M
2.75%
YTD
34.27%
6M
33.93%
1Y
72.40%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
10Y*

IQQH.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
8.45%
YTD
39.28%
6M
35.95%
1Y
78.04%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDG7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C
34.27%23.57%-15.19%-25.56%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
39.28%29.83%-21.49%-21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XDG7.DE and IQQH.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023

0.92

The correlation between XDG7.DE and IQQH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDG7.DE
XDG7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDG7.DEIQQH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.50

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

6.29

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

19.88

-9.02

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG7.DE and IQQH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDG7.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

3.18

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

-0.01

+0.07

Drawdowns

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG7.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG7.DE and IQQH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDG7.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.68%

-86.09%

+37.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.21%

-12.32%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.66%

-44.43%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-24.01%

+21.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.59%

-59.78%

+33.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.64%

3.90%

+2.74%

Volatility

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) is 7.88%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that XDG7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDG7.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

9.79%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

18.31%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.00%

24.37%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

24.69%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

25.08%

-1.00%

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDG7.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDG7.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDG7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.94%1.53%1.32%1.23%0.83%1.23%0.56%2.89%3.30%4.82%4.72%2.86%
XDG7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDG7.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDG7.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDG7.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG7.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDG7.DE and IQQH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer