XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE
XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDG3.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while XDWT.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG3.DE returned 1.94%/yr vs 29.29%/yr for XDWT.DE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDG3.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWT.DE.
Performance
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG3.DE achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.DE's 25.23% return.
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.54%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWT.DE
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 25.23%
- 6M
- 23.47%
- 1Y
- 47.87%
- 3Y*
- 29.29%
- 5Y*
- 22.52%
- 10Y*
- 24.00%
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 2.52% |
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 25.23% | 9.56% | 41.11% | 31.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG3.DE and XDWT.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.23 |
The correlation between XDG3.DE and XDWT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDG3.DE
XDWT.DE
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG3.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.38 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 3.12 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 8.24 | -7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG3.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 2.38 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.09 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG3.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, smaller than the maximum XDWT.DE drawdown of -31.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG3.DE and XDWT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG3.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.49% | -31.61% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -15.59% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -29.46% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -2.61% | -9.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -5.82% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 5.91% | -0.62% |
Volatility
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) is 4.95%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that XDG3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG3.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 7.11% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 14.96% | -4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 20.39% | -5.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 22.55% | -9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 21.46% | -8.15% |
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDG3.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDG3.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDG3.DE nor XDWT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG3.DE and XDWT.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWT.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWT.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
XDG3.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XDWT.DE is Technology Equities. XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG3.DE and 0.25% for XDWT.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDG3.DE and XDWT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer