XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE
XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) and WH2E.DE (Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XDG3.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select while WH2E.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG3.DE returned 1.94%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for WH2E.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDG3.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WH2E.DE.
Performance
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG3.DE achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than WH2E.DE's -3.24% return.
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.54%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WH2E.DE
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- 10.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 0.23% |
WH2E.DE Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -3.24% | 2.78% | 7.94% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG3.DE and WH2E.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XDG3.DE and WH2E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDG3.DE
WH2E.DE
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG3.DE | WH2E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.13 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.83 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 2.15 | -1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG3.DE | WH2E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.68 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.20 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG3.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, smaller than the maximum WH2E.DE drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG3.DE and WH2E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG3.DE | WH2E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.49% | -22.19% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -12.23% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -22.19% | +1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -10.45% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -6.94% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 4.73% | +0.56% |
Volatility
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) and Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) have volatilities of 4.95% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG3.DE | WH2E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 5.21% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 10.46% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 14.86% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 13.91% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 13.91% | -0.60% |
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDG3.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WH2E.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDG3.DE vs. WH2E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDG3.DE nor WH2E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XDG3.DE and WH2E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WH2E.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WH2E.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select, while WH2E.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG3.DE and 0.18% for WH2E.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDG3.DE and WH2E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer