WH2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE).
WH2E.DE and XDWH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WH2E.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Health Care. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both WH2E.DE and XDWH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WH2E.DE or XDWH.DE.
Key characteristics
| WH2E.DE | XDWH.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.07% | 13.24% |
| 1Y Return | 18.96% | 18.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.85 | 1.88 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.64 | 2.68 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.64 | 2.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.43 | 8.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.28% | 2.13% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.41% | 9.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.37% | -26.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.85% | -3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between WH2E.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WH2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WH2E.DE achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's 13.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WH2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WH2E.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WH2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WH2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WH2E.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WH2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WH2E.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.37%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH2E.DE and XDWH.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WH2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WH2E.DE) is 2.08%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that WH2E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.