XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO
XDG.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF) and VDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDG.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while VDY.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDG.TO returned 11.34%/yr vs 17.21%/yr for VDY.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.22% expense ratio.
Performance
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDG.TO achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than VDY.TO's 20.59% return.
XDG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
VDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 6M
- 22.32%
- 1Y
- 46.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 9.07% | 13.74% | 17.44% | 7.06% | 1.78% | 15.16% | -1.68% | 17.32% | 0.98% | 2.14% |
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 20.59% | 29.20% | 20.71% | 8.40% | -0.23% | 36.78% | -1.37% | 21.43% | -10.09% | 9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG.TO and VDY.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017 | 0.59 |
The correlation between XDG.TO and VDY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Consumer Defensive
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Financial Services
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Industrials
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Energy
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Technology
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Utilities
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Communication Services
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Basic Materials
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
Real Estate
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XDG.TO
VDY.TO
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 2.14 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 14.88 | -12.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 60.75 | -51.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 5.65 | -3.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.50 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.84 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, smaller than the maximum VDY.TO drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG.TO and VDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.08% | -39.21% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -3.12% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -10.87% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.33% | -16.18% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -0.77% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -4.61% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 0.76% | +1.44% |
Volatility
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) is 3.12%, while Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that XDG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.31% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 6.87% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 8.21% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 11.56% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 15.96% | -2.82% |
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDG.TO and VDY.TO have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
XDG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than VDY.TO's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.90% | 3.59% | 4.40% | 4.64% | 4.42% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.25% | 4.43% | 3.82% | 3.25% | 4.11% |
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 2.82% | 2.89% | 2.90% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 2.97% | 3.27% | 3.18% | 3.47% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG.TO and VDY.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.22% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDG.TO and VDY.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.22% per year.
XDG.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while VDY.TO is Dividend. XDG.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while VDY.TO tracks FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for XDG.TO and VDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer