XDG.TO vs. XDU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO).
XDG.TO and XDU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 7, 2017. XDU.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on Jun 7, 2017. Both XDG.TO and XDU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDG.TO or XDU.TO.
Key characteristics
| XDG.TO | XDU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.51% | 23.55% |
| 1Y Return | 23.42% | 29.67% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.52% | 11.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.26% | 9.58% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.97 | 3.42 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.24 | 5.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 1.64 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.84 | 6.07 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.20 | 24.28 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.20% | 1.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.75% | 8.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.08% | -26.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.60% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG.TO and XDU.TO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDG.TO vs. XDU.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDG.TO achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly lower than XDU.TO's 23.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDG.TO vs. XDU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDG.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XDU.TO's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDG.TO vs. XDU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDG.TO vs. XDU.TO - Dividend Comparison
XDG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than XDU.TO's 2.21% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 2.80% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 2.97% | 3.27% | 3.18% | 3.47% | 1.67% |
XDU.TO iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF | 2.21% | 2.53% | 2.25% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.53% | 2.48% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
XDG.TO vs. XDU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, roughly equal to the maximum XDU.TO drawdown of -26.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG.TO and XDU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDG.TO vs. XDU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) is 2.35%, while iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that XDG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.