XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDG.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF) and CDIV.TO (Manulife Smart Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDG.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while CDIV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Manulife. XDG.TO is passively managed, while CDIV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDG.TO returned 11.34%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CDIV.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDG.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CDIV.TO.

Performance

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDG.TO achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than CDIV.TO's 14.31% return.

XDG.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

CDIV.TO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 31.29%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF	9.07%	13.74%	17.44%	7.06%	1.78%	15.16%	-0.16%
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	14.31%	25.88%	15.23%	11.77%	-2.50%	26.20%	2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XDG.TO and CDIV.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2020	0.56

The correlation between XDG.TO and CDIV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDG.TO

XDG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
XDG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XDG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XDG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XDG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
XDG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CDIV.TO

CDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDG.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.61	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	3.21	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.53	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	4.20	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	17.38	-8.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the CDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG.TO and CDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDG.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	2.61	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	1.13	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.40	-0.70

Drawdowns

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, which is greater than CDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG.TO and CDIV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDG.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.08%	-16.44%	-10.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-7.48%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.33%	-9.64%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.33%	-16.44%	+4.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-0.55%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-2.83%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	1.81%	+0.39%

Volatility

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Manulife Smart Dividend ETF (CDIV.TO) at 2.82%. This indicates that XDG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDG.TO	CDIV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	2.82%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.06%	10.70%	-2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	12.05%	-1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.56%	12.05%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	11.90%	+1.24%

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDG.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CDIV.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDG.TO vs. CDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than CDIV.TO's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDIV.TO Manulife Smart Dividend ETF	2.28%	3.02%	3.41%	3.45%	3.41%	2.38%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF	2.82%	2.89%	2.90%	3.13%	3.27%	2.97%	3.27%	3.18%	3.47%	1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDG.TO and CDIV.TO in my portfolio?

XDG.TO and CDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDG.TO or CDIV.TO?

On fees, XDG.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDG.TO or CDIV.TO?

XDG.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CDIV.TO.

What is the main difference between XDG.TO and CDIV.TO?

XDG.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CDIV.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XDG.TO and 0.28% for CDIV.TO.