XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO
XDG.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF) and CAGE.TO (Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XDG.TO is passively managed, while CAGE.TO is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CAGE.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 5.14% |
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 11.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDG.TO and CAGE.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XDG.TO
CAGE.TO
XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) and Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDG.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDG.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 4.44 | -3.74 |
Drawdowns
XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, which is greater than CAGE.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG.TO and CAGE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDG.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.08% | -2.93% | -24.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -1.96% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -0.72% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility
XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDG.TO | CAGE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 15.75% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 15.75% | -5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 15.75% | -2.61% |
Dividends
XDG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Dividend Comparison
XDG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while CAGE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 2.82% | 2.89% | 2.90% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 2.97% | 3.27% | 3.18% | 3.47% | 1.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDG.TO and CAGE.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis.
Find the right allocation for XDG.TO and CAGE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer