CAGE.TO vs. CASV.TO
CAGE.TO (Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF) and CASV.TO (Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — CAGE.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while CASV.TO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
CAGE.TO vs. CASV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
CAGE.TO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASV.TO
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAGE.TO vs. CASV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 6.20% |
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAGE.TO and CASV.TO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAGE.TO vs. CASV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE.TO) and Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAGE.TO | CASV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.84 | 12.36 | -4.52 |
Drawdowns
CAGE.TO vs. CASV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAGE.TO drawdown since its inception was -2.93%, which is greater than CASV.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAGE.TO and CASV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAGE.TO | CASV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -1.96% | -0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.24% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -0.29% | -0.25% |
Volatility
CAGE.TO vs. CASV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAGE.TO | CASV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 15.80% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 15.80% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 15.80% | +1.57% |
Dividends
CAGE.TO vs. CASV.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAGE.TO nor CASV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.