PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEW.DE achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than LCUJ.DE's 16.17% return.


XDEW.DE

1D
1.44%
1M
5.26%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.62%
1Y
20.08%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.46%

LCUJ.DE

1D
2.45%
1M
2.12%
YTD
16.17%
6M
16.60%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
11.42%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-6.94%41.59%1.18%31.27%-3.45%
LCUJ.DE
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
16.17%12.72%13.58%16.52%-12.47%10.03%5.07%22.41%-99.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEW.DE and LCUJ.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.58

The correlation between XDEW.DE and LCUJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUJ.DE
LCUJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEW.DELCUJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.11

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.96

9.95

+2.01

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEW.DE and LCUJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum LCUJ.DE drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEW.DE and LCUJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEW.DELCUJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-99.38%

+60.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-10.06%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-16.93%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-19.11%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-98.52%

+98.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-98.36%

+92.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

3.15%

-1.49%

Volatility

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) is 2.32%, while Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that XDEW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEW.DELCUJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

4.47%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

15.34%

-8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

19.13%

-8.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

16.70%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

38.41%

-21.57%

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEW.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEW.DE nor LCUJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEW.DE and LCUJ.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

XDEW.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while LCUJ.DE is Japan Equities. XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while LCUJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDEW.DE and 0.12% for LCUJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEW.DE and LCUJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer