LCUJ.DE vs. DBXJ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE).
LCUJ.DE and DBXJ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCUJ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan. It was launched on Feb 28, 2018. DBXJ.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan. It was launched on Jan 9, 2007. Both LCUJ.DE and DBXJ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCUJ.DE or DBXJ.DE.
Key characteristics
| LCUJ.DE | DBXJ.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.17% | 8.18% |
| 1Y Return | 7.38% | 7.50% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.90% | 1.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.70% | 5.67% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.86% | 16.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.01% | -51.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.49% | -5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUJ.DE and DBXJ.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LCUJ.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCUJ.DE having a 8.17% return and DBXJ.DE slightly higher at 8.18%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCUJ.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LCUJ.DE and DBXJ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCUJ.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCUJ.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCUJ.DE nor DBXJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LCUJ.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.01%, smaller than the maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown of -51.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUJ.DE and DBXJ.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCUJ.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.