XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L
XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and WQDS.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - XDEQ.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while WQDS.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEQ.L returned 11.44%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for WQDS.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDEQ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for WQDS.L.
Performance
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.L achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 14.44% return.
XDEQ.L
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
WQDS.L
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 14.44%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 8.98% | 7.52% | 18.91% | 19.22% | -9.44% | 25.15% | 10.98% | 26.01% | -2.33% | 4.53% |
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 14.44% | 15.54% | 11.68% | 10.80% | 4.05% | 17.47% | -3.37% | 18.77% | -2.36% | -19.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEQ.L and WQDS.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XDEQ.L and WQDS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Financial Services
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Industrials
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Healthcare
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Communication Services
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Consumer Defensive
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Energy
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Basic Materials
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Utilities
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Real Estate
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEQ.L
WQDS.L
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEQ.L | WQDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.53 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 4.47 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.25 | 16.45 | -3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -44.31%, which is greater than WQDS.L's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and WQDS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEQ.L | WQDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.31% | -27.90% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -6.75% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.24% | -14.93% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.24% | -14.93% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.44% | -7.84% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.84% | -0.19% |
Volatility
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 2.83%, while iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEQ.L | WQDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.32% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 7.94% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.93% | 10.50% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 11.58% | +7.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 15.01% | +5.53% |
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDS.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEQ.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison
XDEQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.81% | 2.34% | 2.56% | 2.86% | 2.97% | 2.70% | 3.03% | 3.10% | 3.19% | 0.79% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEQ.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.
XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEQ.L and 0.38% for WQDS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEQ.L and WQDS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer