XDEF vs. CA
XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and CA (Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while CA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CA.
Performance
XDEF vs. CA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDEF
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEF vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.17% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEF and CA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEF vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank
XDEF
CA
XDEF vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEF | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.67 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
XDEF vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and CA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEF | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -5.24% | -94.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.26% | -0.75% | -98.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.45% | -1.27% | -69.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
XDEF vs. CA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEF | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 157.63% | 2.64% | +154.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 157.63% | 3.99% | +153.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 157.63% | 3.99% | +153.64% |
XDEF vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEF vs. CA - Dividend Comparison
XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 2.96% | 3.14% | 3.03% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEF and CA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDEF.
CA has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.00% for XDEF.
XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while CA is Municipal Bonds. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while CA tracks ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.07% for CA.
Find the right allocation for XDEF and CA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer