PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEC vs. FFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDEC vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDEC vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDEC
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December
-1.49%9.71%9.61%14.37%-3.38%1.88%
FFEB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February
-1.36%13.76%16.64%19.95%-7.51%1.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEC achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than FFEB's -1.36% return.


XDEC

1D
1.60%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
0.53%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
10Y*

FFEB

1D
1.97%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
1.28%
1Y
14.47%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDEC vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEC and FFEB have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

XDEC vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEC
XDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FFEB
FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEC vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDECFFEBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

1.17

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.76

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.72

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.71

9.15

-1.44

XDEC vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEC and FFEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDECFFEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.17

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.77

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between XDEC and FFEB is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XDEC vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEC nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDEC vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEC drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEC and FFEB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDECFFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-22.81%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-8.65%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-3.87%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-2.46%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.62%

-0.34%

Volatility

XDEC vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) is 2.94%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that XDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDECFFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.72%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.92%

5.65%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.61%

12.39%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

10.88%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.60%

13.90%

-5.30%