PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEC vs. APRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEC vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDEC having a 5.04% return and APRB slightly higher at 5.26%.


XDEC

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.90%
6M
4.28%
YTD
5.04%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
10Y*

APRB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.77%
6M
4.16%
YTD
5.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEC vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDEC and APRB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEC vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEC
XDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

APRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEC vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDECAPRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

XDEC vs. APRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEC vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEC drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEC and APRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDECAPRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-4.59%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.24%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-0.68%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

Volatility

XDEC vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDECAPRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

5.80%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.40%

5.80%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.40%

5.80%

+2.60%

XDEC vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEC vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEC nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEC and APRB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XDEC.

XDEC and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XDEC and 0.25% for APRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEC and APRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer