XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDBG.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDBG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged), while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDBG.L returned 8.57%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDBG.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.

Performance

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDBG.L is traded in GBp, while XDWH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDBG.L achieves a 23.03% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDBG.L having a 8.57% annualized return and XDWH.L not far ahead at 8.66%.

XDBG.L

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 23.03%
• 6M: 26.01%
• 1Y: 44.88%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: 14.38%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

XDWH.L

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: -2.35%
• 6M: -2.32%
• 1Y: 12.65%
• 3Y*: 2.85%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: 8.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDBG.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged	23.03%	25.68%	8.15%	-11.18%	18.13%	38.25%	-3.17%	5.10%	-12.92%	4.24%
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	-2.35%	7.04%	2.51%	-1.38%	5.83%	21.71%	9.57%	18.28%	7.59%	9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XDBG.L and XDWH.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016	0.04

The correlation between XDBG.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDBG.L	XDWH.L
Technology	36.3%	-
Communication Services	17.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	11.8%	0.5%
Industrials	10.6%	-
Financial Services	5.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	-
Healthcare	4.0%	98.9%
Energy	3.1%	-
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDBG.L

XDBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XDBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XDBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XDBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XDBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

XDWH.L

XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDBG.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	0.86	+1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	1.35	+1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.16	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	1.21	+3.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.39	3.15	+10.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDBG.L and XDWH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDBG.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	0.86	+1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.40	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.56	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.59	-0.51

Drawdowns

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDBG.L drawdown since its inception was -64.69%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDBG.L and XDWH.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDBG.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.69%	-18.80%	-45.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-10.43%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.02%	-18.80%	+5.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.67%	-18.80%	-9.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.06%	-18.80%	-18.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	-5.80%	+3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.22%	-4.41%	-30.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	4.01%	-0.67%

Volatility

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) is 4.24%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that XDBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDBG.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	5.30%	-1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.16%	10.98%	+4.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.76%	14.58%	+3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	14.02%	+4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.01%	15.50%	+0.51%

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDBG.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDBG.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDBG.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDBG.L and XDWH.L in my portfolio?

XDBG.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDBG.L or XDWH.L?

On fees, XDWH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDBG.L or XDWH.L?

XDWH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDBG.L.

What is the main difference between XDBG.L and XDWH.L?

XDBG.L is categorized as Commodities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDBG.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged), while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XDBG.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.