XDBG.L vs. UD06.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L).
XDBG.L and UD06.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDBG.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged). It was launched on Feb 9, 2011. UD06.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged). It was launched on Mar 1, 2018. Both XDBG.L and UD06.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDBG.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged | 15.97% | 25.68% | 8.15% | -11.18% | 18.13% | 38.25% | -3.17% | 5.10% | -13.60% |
UD06.L UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc | 16.50% | 17.64% | 4.23% | -6.66% | 16.62% | 29.24% | 0.29% | 3.70% | -11.14% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDBG.L having a 15.97% return and UD06.L slightly higher at 16.50%.
XDBG.L
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 6M
- 28.69%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
UD06.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 6M
- 23.46%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDBG.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UD06.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDBG.L
UD06.L
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDBG.L | UD06.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.81 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 2.36 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.75 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | 10.53 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDBG.L | UD06.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.81 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.92 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.59 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between XDBG.L and UD06.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDBG.L nor UD06.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDBG.L drawdown since its inception was -64.69%, which is greater than UD06.L's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDBG.L and UD06.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDBG.L | UD06.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.69% | -32.66% | -32.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | -8.82% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.67% | -23.45% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -0.65% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.60% | -11.96% | -23.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 2.42% | +1.20% |
Volatility
XDBG.L vs. UD06.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) at 4.63%. This indicates that XDBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD06.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XDBG.L | UD06.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 4.63% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 10.83% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 14.04% | +5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 14.65% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 13.67% | +2.36% |