PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDBG.L achieves a 23.03% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.L's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, XDBG.L has underperformed XDEQ.L with an annualized return of 8.57%, while XDEQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.


XDBG.L

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.58%
YTD
23.03%
6M
26.01%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
8.57%

XDEQ.L

1D
0.92%
1M
4.55%
YTD
8.63%
6M
9.20%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDBG.L
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged
23.03%25.68%8.15%-11.18%18.13%38.25%-3.17%5.10%-12.92%4.24%
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
8.63%7.52%18.91%19.22%-9.44%24.28%11.14%30.48%-5.16%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XDBG.L and XDEQ.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2014

0.08

The correlation between XDBG.L and XDEQ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.09 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDBG.L
XDEQ.L

Technology

36.3%
30.4%

Communication Services

17.2%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.8%
5.3%

Industrials

10.6%
10.1%

Financial Services

5.2%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
8.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
3.2%

Healthcare

4.0%
9.2%

Energy

3.1%
4.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.7%

Utilities

1.1%
2.7%

Technology

XDBG.L
36.3%
XDEQ.L
30.4%

Communication Services

XDBG.L
17.2%
XDEQ.L
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDBG.L
11.8%
XDEQ.L
5.3%

Industrials

XDBG.L
10.6%
XDEQ.L
10.1%

Financial Services

XDBG.L
5.2%
XDEQ.L
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XDBG.L
4.9%
XDEQ.L
8.9%

Basic Materials

XDBG.L
4.0%
XDEQ.L
3.2%

Healthcare

XDBG.L
4.0%
XDEQ.L
9.2%

Energy

XDBG.L
3.1%
XDEQ.L
4.6%

Real Estate

XDBG.L
2.8%
XDEQ.L
1.7%

Utilities

XDBG.L
1.1%
XDEQ.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDBG.L
XDBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEQ.L
XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDBG.LXDEQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

3.21

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

13.32

+0.06

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDBG.L and XDEQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDBG.LXDEQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.26

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.87

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

1.13

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.21

-1.13

Drawdowns

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDBG.L drawdown since its inception was -64.69%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDBG.L and XDEQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDBG.LXDEQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.69%

-23.79%

-40.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-6.90%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-17.96%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.67%

-17.96%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.06%

-23.79%

-13.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

0.00%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.22%

-3.78%

-31.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.67%

+1.67%

Volatility

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that XDBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDBG.LXDEQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

2.57%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

7.12%

+8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

9.81%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

13.37%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

16.89%

-0.88%

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDBG.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDBG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDBG.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDBG.L and XDEQ.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDBG.L.

XDBG.L is categorized as Commodities, while XDEQ.L is Global Equities. XDBG.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged), while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XDBG.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDBG.L and XDEQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer