XDAT vs. SMMU
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and SMMU (PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SMMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned -1.82%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for SMMU. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMMU.
Performance
XDAT vs. SMMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than SMMU's 1.15% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.44%
SMMU
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.94M | $5.92M | $6.06M | |
| $42.52K | $24.92K | $17.00K |
XDAT vs. SMMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -0.52% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 9.61% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 1.15% | 4.06% | 2.68% | 4.39% | -2.45% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and SMMU is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. SMMU — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
SMMU
XDAT vs. SMMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.55 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 3.56 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 12.02 | -12.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. SMMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than SMMU's maximum drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and SMMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -5.09% | -49.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -0.77% | -28.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -1.95% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | -4.74% | -50.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.77% | -0.26% | -16.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -0.55% | -25.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.89% | 0.23% | +14.66% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. SMMU - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) at 0.34%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 0.34% | +7.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.83% | 0.84% | +19.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.26% | 1.05% | +24.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 1.68% | +28.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 2.70% | +26.67% |
XDAT vs. SMMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. SMMU - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 0.60% | 1.19% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 1.03% | 0.89% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and SMMU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDAT has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to SMMU (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs SMMU's -5.09%.
On 5-year performance, SMMU leads with 1.86% vs -1.82% for XDAT. On fees, SMMU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMMU has performed better with a 1.86% return vs -1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
SMMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.35% for SMMU.
SMMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and SMMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer