XDAT vs. MEAR
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while MEAR is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned -1.82%/yr vs 2.44%/yr for MEAR. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
XDAT vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than MEAR's 1.21% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.44%
MEAR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.75M | $11.17M | $9.28M | |
| $42.52K | $24.92K | $17.00K |
XDAT vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -0.52% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 9.61% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.21% | 3.76% | 3.40% | 3.93% | 0.10% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and MEAR is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
MEAR
XDAT vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.68 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 5.76 | -5.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 22.81 | -22.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -2.68% | -52.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -0.47% | -29.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -0.86% | -28.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | -1.10% | -53.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.77% | -0.07% | -16.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -0.19% | -25.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.89% | 0.12% | +14.77% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) at 0.27%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 0.27% | +7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.83% | 0.62% | +20.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.26% | 0.89% | +24.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 0.99% | +28.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 1.51% | +27.86% |
XDAT vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.84% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and MEAR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDAT has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to MEAR (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs MEAR's -2.68%.
On 5-year performance, MEAR leads with 2.44% vs -1.82% for XDAT. On fees, MEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MEAR has performed better with a 2.44% return vs -1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
MEAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while MEAR is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.25% for MEAR.
MEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer