XDAT vs. MEAR
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while MEAR is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned 1.26%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for MEAR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
XDAT vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than MEAR's 1.06% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- -1.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- —
MEAR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
XDAT vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.92% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 10.86% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.06% | 3.76% | 3.40% | 3.93% | 0.10% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and MEAR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
MEAR
XDAT vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDAT | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.91 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 7.07 | -7.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 28.99 | -29.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDAT | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 3.86 | -3.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 2.48 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 1.11 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -2.68% | -52.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -0.47% | -29.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -0.86% | -28.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | -1.12% | -53.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | 0.00% | -15.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.91% | -0.19% | -25.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.78% | 0.11% | +13.67% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) at 0.24%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 0.24% | +8.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | 0.61% | +18.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.56% | 0.86% | +22.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.45% | 0.98% | +28.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 1.52% | +27.91% |
XDAT vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.84% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and MEAR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDAT has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to MEAR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs MEAR's -2.68%.
On 5-year performance, MEAR leads with 2.43% vs 1.26% for XDAT. On fees, MEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MEAR has performed better with a 2.43% return vs 1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
MEAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while MEAR is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.25% for MEAR.
MEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer