XDAT vs. FTXL
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. XDAT is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned 1.26%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
XDAT vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- -1.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
XDAT vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.92% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 10.86% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 22.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and FTXL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDAT and FTXL has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XDAT vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDAT
FTXL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XDAT
FTXL
Communication Services
XDAT
FTXL
-
Real Estate
XDAT
FTXL
-
Financial Services
XDAT
FTXL
-
Healthcare
XDAT
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDAT
FTXL
-
Industrials
XDAT
FTXL
Basic Materials
XDAT
-
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
XDAT
-
FTXL
-
Energy
XDAT
-
FTXL
-
Utilities
XDAT
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
FTXL
XDAT vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDAT | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.78 | -0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 15.62 | -15.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 58.28 | -58.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDAT | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 6.33 | -6.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.97 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.94 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -43.87% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -14.51% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -41.57% | +12.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | -43.87% | -11.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | 0.00% | -15.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.91% | -10.56% | -15.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.78% | 3.88% | +9.90% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) is 8.56%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that XDAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 14.28% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | 28.98% | -9.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.56% | 35.94% | -12.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.45% | 36.02% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 34.25% | -4.82% |
XDAT vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and FTXL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to XDAT (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 1.26% for XDAT. On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XDAT has been the lower-risk option at 8.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer