PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDAT vs. FLIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDAT vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.92% return.


XDAT

1D
-3.31%
1M
10.82%
YTD
0.92%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
-1.19%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*

FLIN

1D
-1.51%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
-11.92%
6M
-10.85%
1Y
-11.63%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
0.92%1.87%16.54%45.77%-45.71%10.86%
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
-11.92%2.40%10.33%20.58%-7.96%18.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and FLIN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021

0.41

The correlation between XDAT and FLIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDAT vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDAT
FLIN

Technology

53.3%
8.4%

Communication Services

35.1%
4.6%

Real Estate

5.7%
1.3%

Financial Services

4.1%
27.2%

Healthcare

2.6%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
12.0%

Industrials

0.5%
10.3%

Basic Materials

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.8%

Energy

-

9.5%

Utilities

-

5.3%

Technology

XDAT
53.3%
FLIN
8.4%

Communication Services

XDAT
35.1%
FLIN
4.6%

Real Estate

XDAT
5.7%
FLIN
1.3%

Financial Services

XDAT
4.1%
FLIN
27.2%

Healthcare

XDAT
2.6%
FLIN
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XDAT
1.3%
FLIN
12.0%

Industrials

XDAT
0.5%
FLIN
10.3%

Basic Materials

XDAT

-

FLIN
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

XDAT

-

FLIN
5.8%

Energy

XDAT

-

FLIN
9.5%

Utilities

XDAT

-

FLIN
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDAT vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT
XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FLIN
FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDATFLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.88

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

-0.62

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

-1.54

+1.45

XDAT vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAT and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDATFLINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

-0.78

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.23

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.26

-0.23

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than FLIN's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and FLIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDATFLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.87%

-41.90%

-12.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.56%

-18.79%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.56%

-22.85%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.87%

-22.85%

-32.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.57%

-18.91%

+3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-8.01%

-17.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.78%

7.57%

+6.21%

Volatility

XDAT vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 5.21%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDATFLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

5.21%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

12.81%

+6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

14.92%

+8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.45%

15.74%

+13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.43%

20.45%

+8.98%

XDAT vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDAT vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
0.64%0.56%1.58%0.73%0.73%2.26%0.68%0.90%0.92%
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
0.00%0.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDAT and FLIN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDAT has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to FLIN (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

On 5-year performance, FLIN leads with 3.56% vs 1.26% for XDAT. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLIN has performed better with a 3.56% return vs 1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.

FLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.

XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.19% for FLIN.

XDAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDAT and FLIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer