XDAT vs. DWAT
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
XDAT vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDAT
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- -1.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDAT vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 19.98% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
XDAT vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDAT
DWAT
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XDAT
DWAT
Communication Services
XDAT
DWAT
Real Estate
XDAT
DWAT
Financial Services
XDAT
DWAT
Healthcare
XDAT
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
XDAT
DWAT
Industrials
XDAT
DWAT
Basic Materials
XDAT
-
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
XDAT
-
DWAT
Energy
XDAT
-
DWAT
Utilities
XDAT
-
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
DWAT
XDAT vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDAT | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDAT | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | 0.00% | -54.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | 0.00% | -15.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.91% | 0.00% | -25.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.78% | — | — |
Volatility
XDAT vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.56% | 0.00% | +23.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.45% | 0.00% | +29.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 0.00% | +29.43% |
XDAT vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDAT nor DWAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
XDAT and DWAT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer