PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDAT vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDAT vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XDAT

1D
-3.31%
1M
10.82%
YTD
0.92%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
-1.19%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


XDAT vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDAT
DWAT

Technology

53.3%
10.2%

Communication Services

35.1%
3.4%

Real Estate

5.7%
5.1%

Financial Services

4.1%
27.2%

Healthcare

2.6%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
5.2%

Industrials

0.5%
25.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Energy

-

4.2%

Utilities

-

5.3%

Technology

XDAT
53.3%
DWAT
10.2%

Communication Services

XDAT
35.1%
DWAT
3.4%

Real Estate

XDAT
5.7%
DWAT
5.1%

Financial Services

XDAT
4.1%
DWAT
27.2%

Healthcare

XDAT
2.6%
DWAT
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDAT
1.3%
DWAT
5.2%

Industrials

XDAT
0.5%
DWAT
25.1%

Basic Materials

XDAT

-

DWAT
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDAT

-

DWAT
6.5%

Energy

XDAT

-

DWAT
4.2%

Utilities

XDAT

-

DWAT
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDAT vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT
XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDATDWATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

XDAT vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDATDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and DWAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDATDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.87%

0.00%

-54.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.57%

0.00%

-15.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

0.00%

-25.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.78%

Volatility

XDAT vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDATDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

0.00%

+23.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.45%

0.00%

+29.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.43%

0.00%

+29.43%

XDAT vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDAT vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDAT nor DWAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
0.00%0.00%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

XDAT and DWAT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 1.83% for DWAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDAT and DWAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer