PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD9D.DE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than XESC.DE's 7.20% return.


XD9D.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.52%
YTD
11.29%
6M
10.68%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*

XESC.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
1.88%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.62%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XD9D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF
11.29%4.60%32.05%23.70%-15.63%33.05%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
7.20%22.24%11.06%22.50%-8.87%19.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XD9D.DE and XESC.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.65

The correlation between XD9D.DE and XESC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD9D.DE
XD9D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XD9D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XD9D.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.45

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

4.94

+6.94

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD9D.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD9D.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XD9D.DEXESC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.98

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.65

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.32

+0.67

Drawdowns

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD9D.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD9D.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XD9D.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-45.38%

+21.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

-10.88%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-16.53%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

-23.33%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.53%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-8.39%

+3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

3.19%

-1.07%

Volatility

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) is 2.77%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XD9D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XD9D.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

4.90%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

13.02%

-5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

16.01%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

17.54%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

18.27%

-2.91%

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XD9D.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XD9D.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

XD9D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while XESC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XD9D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.83%0.94%1.17%1.16%1.08%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XD9D.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XD9D.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XD9D.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XESC.DE.

XD9D.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XD9D.DE tracks MSCI USA, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XD9D.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XD9D.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer