XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L
XD3E.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D) and XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XD3E.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XNAQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XD3E.L returned 7.05%/yr vs 18.96%/yr for XNAQ.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XD3E.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAQ.L.
Performance
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XD3E.L is traded in GBp, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XD3E.L achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than XNAQ.L's 19.89% return.
XD3E.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 19.89%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 41.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- —
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XD3E.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D | 7.41% | 32.73% | 0.31% | 10.10% | -8.51% | 6.37% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.89% | 11.71% | 28.62% | 47.83% | -25.44% | 26.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XD3E.L and XNAQ.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.29 |
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Energy
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Consumer Defensive
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Industrials
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Utilities
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Basic Materials
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Healthcare
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Real Estate
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Technology
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Communication Services
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XD3E.L
XNAQ.L
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XD3E.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.50 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.79 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 11.13 | -6.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XD3E.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.83 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.00 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.93 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XD3E.L drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than XNAQ.L's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD3E.L and XNAQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XD3E.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.35% | -27.52% | -34.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -10.99% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | -24.56% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.44% | -27.52% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.63% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -7.01% | -21.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.75% | -0.49% |
Volatility
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) is 2.88%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that XD3E.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XD3E.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 4.18% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 10.38% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 14.73% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 19.04% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 19.13% | +0.17% |
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XD3E.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XD3E.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
XD3E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while XNAQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XD3E.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XD3E.L and XNAQ.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAQ.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAQ.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XD3E.L.
XD3E.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNAQ.L is Nasdaq-100. XD3E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XD3E.L and 0.20% for XNAQ.L.
Find the right allocation for XD3E.L and XNAQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer