XD3E.L vs. CNX1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L).
XD3E.L and CNX1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XD3E.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Jun 1, 2007. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both XD3E.L and CNX1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XD3E.L or CNX1.L.
Key characteristics
| XD3E.L | CNX1.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.67% | 11.14% |
| 1Y Return | 9.85% | 20.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.11% | 10.10% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.89% | 18.91% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.25% | 19.90% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.98 | 1.27 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.25% | 16.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.56% | -27.56% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.79% | -8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XD3E.L and CNX1.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XD3E.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XD3E.L achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XD3E.L has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 11.25%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XD3E.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XD3E.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XD3E.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XD3E.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
XD3E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XD3E.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D | 5.07% | 4.28% | 4.41% | 5.88% | 5.81% | 2.39% | 4.49% | 2.86% | 2.73% | 0.14% | 4.39% | 4.26% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XD3E.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XD3E.L drawdown since its inception was -60.56%, which is greater than CNX1.L's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD3E.L and CNX1.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XD3E.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) is 4.37%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that XD3E.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.