PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XD3E.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XD3E.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XD3E.L returned 11.22%/yr vs 17.45%/yr for CMB1.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XD3E.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.

Performance

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD3E.L achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 16.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XD3E.L has underperformed CMB1.L with an annualized return of 11.22%, while CMB1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.45% annualized return.

XD3E.L

1D
0.30%
1M
3.01%
YTD
12.31%
6M
12.82%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
11.22%

CMB1.L

1D
0.03%
1M
3.29%
YTD
16.99%
6M
17.62%
1Y
38.46%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
20.58%
10Y*
17.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XD3E.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D		12.31%39.69%5.65%15.53%-4.31%11.28%-3.93%14.79%-11.60%13.96%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		16.99%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-13.79%22.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XD3E.L and CMB1.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.82

The correlation between XD3E.L and CMB1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XD3E.L
CMB1.L

Financial Services

30.2%
47.2%

Energy

14.8%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
0.4%

Industrials

8.1%
11.1%

Utilities

7.9%
15.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%
0.5%

Healthcare

4.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.3%

Technology

1.7%
6.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

XD3E.L
30.2%
CMB1.L
47.2%

Energy

XD3E.L
14.8%
CMB1.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XD3E.L
13.7%
CMB1.L
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

XD3E.L
8.4%
CMB1.L
0.4%

Industrials

XD3E.L
8.1%
CMB1.L
11.1%

Utilities

XD3E.L
7.9%
CMB1.L
15.3%

Basic Materials

XD3E.L
7.5%
CMB1.L
0.5%

Healthcare

XD3E.L
4.3%
CMB1.L
1.1%

Real Estate

XD3E.L
3.5%
CMB1.L
0.3%

Technology

XD3E.L
1.7%
CMB1.L
6.0%

Communication Services

XD3E.L
0.0%
CMB1.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with XD3E.L:
XD3E.L vs. SCHDXD3E.L vs. CNX1.LXD3E.L vs. LDEG.LXD3E.L vs. FDDXD3E.L vs. VUSA.LXD3E.L vs. HDEU.LXD3E.L vs. XSTC.L
Often compared with CMB1.L:
CMB1.L vs. XDEM.LCMB1.L vs. H50E.LCMB1.L vs. IITU.LCMB1.L vs. SPYCMB1.L vs. IQSA.LCMB1.L vs. X7PP.LCMB1.L vs. EQQQ.L

Return for Risk

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XD3E.L
XD3E.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XD3E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XD3E.LCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.59
2.54

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.34
3.42

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.71

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

13.55

-2.69

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD3E.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD3E.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD3E.L drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than CMB1.L's maximum drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD3E.L and CMB1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XD3E.LCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-56.05%

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-10.32%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-15.62%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-24.19%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.84%

-36.61%

+4.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-2.84%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.99%

-15.20%

-9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.83%

-0.23%

Volatility

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) is 2.09%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that XD3E.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XD3E.LCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

3.96%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

12.40%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

15.07%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

18.01%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

20.12%

-4.58%

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XD3E.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

XD3E.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

XD3E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XD3E.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D		4.37%4.91%5.50%4.27%4.42%5.89%5.87%2.39%4.49%2.88%2.71%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

XD3E.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XD3E.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XD3E.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.

XD3E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XD3E.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XD3E.L and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer