PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCX6.L achieves a -7.52% return, which is significantly lower than XDEB.L's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX6.L has underperformed XDEB.L with an annualized return of 5.39%, while XDEB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.93% annualized return.


XCX6.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
-7.52%
6M
-9.53%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
-4.51%
10Y*
5.39%

XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCX6.L
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C
-7.52%22.42%20.57%-17.10%-13.36%-21.25%25.03%17.56%-14.28%40.17%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XCX6.L and XDEB.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between XCX6.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCX6.L
XDEB.L

Consumer Cyclical

26.5%
5.6%

Financial Services

19.1%
14.0%

Communication Services

18.8%
12.1%

Technology

9.6%
20.1%

Basic Materials

5.5%
1.1%

Healthcare

5.4%
13.8%

Industrials

5.0%
9.2%

Energy

3.7%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
10.9%

Utilities

1.7%
8.1%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XCX6.L
26.5%
XDEB.L
5.6%

Financial Services

XCX6.L
19.1%
XDEB.L
14.0%

Communication Services

XCX6.L
18.8%
XDEB.L
12.1%

Technology

XCX6.L
9.6%
XDEB.L
20.1%

Basic Materials

XCX6.L
5.5%
XDEB.L
1.1%

Healthcare

XCX6.L
5.4%
XDEB.L
13.8%

Industrials

XCX6.L
5.0%
XDEB.L
9.2%

Energy

XCX6.L
3.7%
XDEB.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

XCX6.L
3.2%
XDEB.L
10.9%

Utilities

XCX6.L
1.7%
XDEB.L
8.1%

Real Estate

XCX6.L
1.5%
XDEB.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCX6.L
XCX6.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XCX6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCX6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCX6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XCX6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCX6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCX6.LXDEB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.06

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.41

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

1.14

-0.52

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCX6.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCX6.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCX6.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

0.33

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.66

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.69

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.78

-0.63

Drawdowns

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCX6.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX6.L and XDEB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCX6.LXDEB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-19.61%

-37.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.48%

-6.39%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.89%

-8.47%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.99%

-10.19%

-39.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.08%

-19.61%

-37.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.10%

-3.52%

-30.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-3.50%

-17.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

2.32%

+6.03%

Volatility

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) at 2.66%. This indicates that XCX6.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCX6.LXDEB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

2.66%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

5.97%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.39%

7.97%

+10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.71%

9.68%

+18.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

11.52%

+13.75%

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCX6.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCX6.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCX6.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XCX6.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCX6.L.

XCX6.L is categorized as China Equities, while XDEB.L is Global Equities. XCX6.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XCX6.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCX6.L and XDEB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer