XCX5.L vs. IIND.L
XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and IIND.L (iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both India Equities funds tracking the MSCI India NR USD, from Xtrackers and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCX5.L returned 4.57%/yr vs 5.16%/yr for IIND.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XCX5.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IIND.L.
Performance
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCX5.L is traded in GBp, while IIND.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IIND.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCX5.L achieves a -10.21% return, which is significantly lower than IIND.L's -9.63% return.
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
IIND.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -9.63%
- 1Y
- -10.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -10.21% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | 3.50% |
IIND.L iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -9.63% | -2.94% | 11.13% | 12.43% | 2.72% | 26.95% | 10.48% | 3.72% | -21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCX5.L and IIND.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XCX5.L and IIND.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Consumer Cyclical
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Industrials
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Energy
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Basic Materials
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Technology
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Healthcare
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Consumer Defensive
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Communication Services
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Utilities
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Real Estate
XCX5.L
IIND.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCX5.L
IIND.L
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCX5.L | IIND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.55 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -1.09 | -0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum IIND.L drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX5.L and IIND.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCX5.L | IIND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -45.07% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.88% | -19.76% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -24.81% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -24.81% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.86% | -18.89% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -13.09% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.87% | 9.98% | -0.11% |
Volatility
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that XCX5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCX5.L | IIND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 4.24% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 13.77% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 16.20% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 21.38% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 24.90% | -2.79% |
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX5.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IIND.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCX5.L vs. IIND.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCX5.L nor IIND.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XCX5.L and IIND.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IIND.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IIND.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XCX5.L and 0.65% for IIND.L.
Find the right allocation for XCX5.L and IIND.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer