XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L
XCX4.L (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) and ITWN.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XCX4.L tracks the MSCI Thailand NR THB while ITWN.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCX4.L returned 4.74%/yr vs 22.42%/yr for ITWN.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCX4.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for ITWN.L.
Performance
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCX4.L achieves a 23.91% return, which is significantly lower than ITWN.L's 69.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX4.L has underperformed ITWN.L with an annualized return of 4.74%, while ITWN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.42% annualized return.
XCX4.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 23.91%
- 6M
- 20.76%
- 1Y
- 51.67%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.74%
ITWN.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 69.14%
- 6M
- 73.32%
- 1Y
- 105.82%
- 3Y*
- 41.40%
- 5Y*
- 22.74%
- 10Y*
- 22.42%
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C | 23.91% | 0.32% | 1.51% | -16.15% | 15.60% | 0.13% | -13.81% | 3.68% | 0.70% | 21.77% |
ITWN.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 69.14% | 22.61% | 25.77% | 21.84% | -21.08% | 29.84% | 30.38% | 29.88% | -3.90% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCX4.L and ITWN.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | 0.49 |
The correlation between XCX4.L and ITWN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Industrials
Energy
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Industrials
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Energy
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
-
Communication Services
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Financial Services
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Consumer Defensive
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Healthcare
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Utilities
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
-
Basic Materials
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Real Estate
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
Technology
XCX4.L
-
ITWN.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCX4.L
ITWN.L
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCX4.L | ITWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.69 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 11.24 | -6.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 29.80 | -15.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX4.L drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than ITWN.L's maximum drawdown of -72.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX4.L and ITWN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCX4.L | ITWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.74% | -72.46% | -26.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -9.36% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.34% | -29.32% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.52% | -30.07% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.74% | -30.07% | -68.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -6.00% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -21.95% | +5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 3.54% | +0.14% |
Volatility
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) is 6.40%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that XCX4.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCX4.L | ITWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 10.48% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 20.41% | -3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 24.41% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 21.14% | -3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,419.36% | 20.45% | +2,398.91% |
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX4.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ITWN.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCX4.L vs. ITWN.L - Dividend Comparison
XCX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITWN.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.50% | 1.37% | 2.14% | 3.54% | 1.33% | 1.83% | 2.30% | 2.72% | 2.74% | 2.86% | 3.21% |
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCX4.L and ITWN.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCX4.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCX4.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ITWN.L.
XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB, while ITWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCX4.L and 0.74% for ITWN.L.
Find the right allocation for XCX4.L and ITWN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer