PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITWN.L vs. SPINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund (SPINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ITWN.L is traded in GBp, while SPINX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPINX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITWN.L achieves a 70.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPINX's 11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ITWN.L has outperformed SPINX with an annualized return of 23.32%, while SPINX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.39% annualized return.


ITWN.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
20.69%
YTD
70.71%
6M
75.80%
1Y
123.34%
3Y*
41.33%
5Y*
23.35%
10Y*
23.32%

SPINX

1D
0.11%
1M
6.40%
YTD
11.81%
6M
10.96%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
16.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITWN.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
70.71%22.61%25.77%21.84%-21.08%29.84%29.40%30.88%-3.90%16.56%
SPINX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund
11.81%9.49%26.18%19.93%-8.56%29.84%14.87%26.42%1.20%11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ITWN.L and SPINX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2013

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITWN.L vs. SPINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITWN.L
ITWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ITWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SPINX
SPINX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund (SPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITWN.LSPINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.50

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.10

4.11

+8.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.58

15.95

+20.62

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITWN.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.38, which is higher than the SPINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITWN.L and SPINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITWN.LSPINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38

2.66

+2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.69

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

0.78

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.79

-0.14

Drawdowns

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITWN.L drawdown since its inception was -48.27%, which is greater than SPINX's maximum drawdown of -34.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWN.L and SPINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITWN.LSPINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.27%

-34.75%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-7.49%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-34.75%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-34.75%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.07%

-34.75%

+4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-2.94%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-4.94%

-4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

1.92%

+1.44%

Volatility

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund (SPINX) at 2.69%. This indicates that ITWN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITWN.LSPINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

2.69%

+7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

8.24%

+10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.83%

11.58%

+11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

22.00%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

21.22%

-0.67%

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITWN.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SPINX's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITWN.L vs. SPINX - Dividend Comparison

ITWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SPINX's 10.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITWN.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.88%1.50%1.37%2.14%3.54%1.33%1.83%2.28%2.72%2.74%2.86%3.23%
SPINX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund
10.67%11.90%26.02%9.77%9.59%6.58%3.58%3.01%4.94%2.32%1.97%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITWN.L and SPINX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITWN.L and SPINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer