PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCV.TO achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO has outperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 13.20%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.85% annualized return.


XCV.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.70%
YTD
19.17%
6M
19.26%
1Y
44.26%
3Y*
27.30%
5Y*
17.83%
10Y*
13.20%

XEG.TO

1D
1.17%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
44.34%
6M
39.73%
1Y
70.40%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
29.48%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
19.17%32.17%21.26%9.47%1.87%32.71%-2.56%18.02%-11.15%8.75%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
44.34%16.72%14.08%3.52%53.25%83.71%-34.41%8.98%-27.05%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XCV.TO and XEG.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2006

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between XCV.TO and XEG.TO has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCV.TO
XCV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCV.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.03

1.49

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.53

6.36

+5.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

43.47

19.02

+24.44

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.97, which is higher than the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCV.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCV.TOXEG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97

3.11

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

1.04

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.36

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.28

+0.26

Drawdowns

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCV.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCV.TO and XEG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCV.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.49%

-87.74%

+35.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.86%

-11.12%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

-25.67%

+15.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-28.42%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.18%

-79.66%

+38.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-4.00%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-29.19%

+22.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

3.71%

-2.69%

Volatility

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) is 3.27%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that XCV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCV.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

9.31%

-6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

18.99%

-11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.96%

22.76%

-13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

28.62%

-15.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

33.41%

-17.87%

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCV.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than XEG.TO's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
2.29%2.71%3.72%3.88%3.18%2.11%3.35%3.06%3.13%2.40%2.50%3.14%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.65%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCV.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCV.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCV.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XEG.TO.

XCV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. XCV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XCV.TO and 0.61% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCV.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer