PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCV.TO achieves a 26.43% return, which is significantly higher than XBAL.TO's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO has outperformed XBAL.TO with an annualized return of 13.72%, while XBAL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.57% annualized return.


XCV.TO

1D
0.34%
1M
3.32%
6M
25.65%
YTD
26.43%
1Y
49.66%
3Y*
29.41%
5Y*
20.01%
10Y*
13.72%

XBAL.TO

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.73%
6M
6.02%
YTD
8.69%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
26.43%32.30%21.41%9.62%1.98%32.81%-2.43%18.14%-11.06%8.85%
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
8.69%11.90%15.80%13.05%-11.16%10.16%10.73%15.34%-2.73%5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XCV.TO and XBAL.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007

0.45

The correlation between XCV.TO and XBAL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCV.TO
XCV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAL.TO
XBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCV.TOXBAL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.11

1.33

+0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.00

2.67

+10.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.88

10.53

+38.35

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.45, which is higher than the XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCV.TO and XBAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCV.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.45%, which is greater than XBAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCV.TO and XBAL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCV.TOXBAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.45%

-28.55%

-23.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-6.06%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

-9.34%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

-17.10%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.18%

-20.93%

-20.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.22%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-3.35%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.54%

-0.52%

Volatility

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) is 1.96%, while iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that XCV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCV.TOXBAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

3.44%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

7.87%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.17%

9.22%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.79%

8.96%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

9.80%

+5.70%

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAL.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCV.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, which matches XBAL.TO's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.21%2.27%2.72%2.43%2.12%1.78%2.04%2.31%3.47%3.00%3.72%3.38%
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
2.19%2.78%3.84%4.00%3.28%2.18%3.46%3.16%3.23%2.49%2.57%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCV.TO and XBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XCV.TO.

XCV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XBAL.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XCV.TO and 0.20% for XBAL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCV.TO and XBAL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer