PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCV.TO achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO has underperformed VFV.TO with an annualized return of 13.90%, while VFV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.


XCV.TO

1D
0.56%
1M
2.97%
YTD
23.70%
6M
20.64%
1Y
48.75%
3Y*
30.45%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
13.90%

VFV.TO

1D
-1.05%
1M
1.53%
YTD
11.93%
6M
11.21%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
16.08%
10Y*
16.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
23.70%32.30%21.41%9.62%1.98%32.81%-2.43%18.14%-11.06%8.85%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
11.93%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.61%25.14%2.95%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XCV.TO and VFV.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2012

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCV.TO
XCV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCV.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.11

1.43

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.76

3.23

+9.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.00

12.15

+35.86

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.40, which is higher than the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCV.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCV.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.45%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCV.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCV.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.45%

-27.43%

-25.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-8.62%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

-19.05%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

-22.19%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.18%

-27.43%

-13.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.27%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-3.35%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.28%

-1.26%

Volatility

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) is 2.88%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that XCV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCV.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.52%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

9.34%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

11.97%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

15.02%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

16.61%

-1.09%

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than VFV.TO's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.84%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.69%1.51%1.65%1.63%
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
2.25%2.78%3.84%4.00%3.28%2.18%3.46%3.16%3.23%2.49%2.57%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCV.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XCV.TO.

XCV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. XCV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XCV.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCV.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer